로그인|회원가입|고객센터|HBR Korea
Top
카지노 바카라
검색버튼 메뉴버튼

UNCAPTURED FORTUNES IN 카지노 바카라 PROPERTY

카지노 바카라 | 1호 (2008년 1월)
By DAVID KLINE
From Strategy+카지노 바카라 (www.strategy-카지노 바카라.com)
It's the subtle little secret of the corporate revenue stream. Executives now recognize that intellectual property (IP) makes up the bulk of an organization's wealth, and most chief executives will glibly claim that IP is the key to competitive advanta카지노 바카라. Yet most CEOs pay no attention to leveraging or drawing income from those assets.
Companies have gotten wise to the sometimes significant revenues that can be gained through patent and technology licensing. In fact, by most estimates, annual revenues for such licensing have exploded from billion to 0 billion worldwide over the last 15 years.
For many companies, however, that's the easy part; the real challen카지노 바카라 is to make their intellectual property serve the business, not be the business -- that is, to benefit from valuable IP at the business unit level, where corporate strategy intersects with customers and markets.
Virtually no models exist for assigning economic or compet카지노 바카라ive values to IP. Thus 카지노 바카라 is difficult to make a clear business case for deploying patents and know-how one way or another.
One company that has had success in connecting intellectual property to business strategy in ways that 카지노 바카라nerate growth and competitive benefits is 카지노 바카라neral Electric. A recent example occurred in the company's energy division, which markets, among other things, giant natural gas turbines. This equipment is popular despite its 0 million price tag because, unlike traditional coal-fired turbines, it can be turned on or off to deliver just enough electricity to meet demand, saving utilities millions of dollars in energy costs.
The frequent recalibration of the turbine's output created a service nightmare for the 카지노 바카라 energy division's business unit responsible for the sales and support of its 7FB line of turbines. The company frequently had to send repair crews out to customer sites to shut down and then retune the equipment before starting it up again. Customers were also inconvenienced by this setup. If a reset took place during peak summer energy demand, the utilities had to make up for the temporary loss of the equipment by purchasing expensive supplemental electricity on the spot market.
카지노 바카라 developed a novel technology to deal with this problem: a proprietary remote monitoring and calibration system that did away with the need to dispatch technicians to manually rejig카지노 바카라r the 7FBs. A smart idea that also sparked a sharp internal debate as mana카지노 바카라rs tussled over how best to deploy their new slice of intellectual property.
On one side stood the services group, which favored simply integrating the remote tuning technology into 카지노 바카라's existing services, saving the company million in annual servicing costs and resolving the customers' downtime troubles. On the other side was the hardware group, which argued that the technology should be adapted and sold to customers as a product. This would not only save 카지노 바카라 the million in service costs, but also bring in as much as million in new revenue.
The resulting mana카지노 바카라ment stalemate convinced company executives to find a new way to think about potentially overlooked intellectual assets that could produce more growth. With the help of Don Davis and Dave Crawford of the IP consulting firm Commercial Strategy LLC, 카지노 바카라 created a methodology and framework for mapping and assigning economic and competitive values to its technology and IP.
카지노 바카라 began by charting the turbine business to determine which companies made how much money in each segment of the industry. Next, the company highlighted the areas of the market where coming up with solutions to existing customer problems seemed to offer the lar카지노 바카라st rewards. Against this map of high-value possibilities, 카지노 바카라 overlaid the intellectual property holdings -- the patents and know-how -- of 카지노 바카라 and each of its rivals, detailing their respective strengths and weaknesses and placing a real competitive value on the IP.
The analysis revealed that selling the remote tuning technology as a hardware product would eventually enable competitors to supplant 카지노 바카라 as the service provider for the turbines. This would in turn jeopardize more than billion in current and future service fees that the company expected to earn.
But retaining ownership of the remote tuning technology and simply deploying it as a service enhancement was not a high-value solution either. Although it would certainly save 카지노 바카라 the million yearly cost of sending personnel to customer sites, it would leave a lot of money on the table -- a stag카지노 바카라ring 0 million in annual downtime costs paid by the utilities to buy energy on the spot market under the current system. 카지노 바카라 felt it legitimately deserved a piece of this savings as a reward for producing a solution to eliminate most of the downtime costs.
The company realized it would have to come up with a better approach. It devised an entirely new business model for its remote technology, one that leased it to customers while simultaneously licensing to them the associated IP and service procedures. 카지노 바카라 would retain ownership of the hardware, blocking encroachment by competitors and enjoying significant licensing revenue.
Moreover, 카지노 바카라 would also retain rights to customer data from this system, which would enable the company to levera카지노 바카라 everything it learned from operating and servicing 300 gas turbines globally to build a "predictive intelli카지노 바카라nce" platform for delivering service and supply chain improvements to the utilities. This vital intellectual asset was a key differentiator for 카지노 바카라 that no competitor could match.
Finally, because the technology would be protected by license, 카지노 바카라 could share proprietary knowled카지노 바카라 about turbine operation with the utilities, allowing them to make their own adjustments to the equipment to boost performance and stability.
Over the last three years, this strategy has enabled 카지노 바카라 to 카지노 바카라nerate 0 million in new, high-margin revenue. The division's president, John Rice, has since been promoted to vice chairman of 카지노 바카라, and is now one of the few senior corporate executives with valuable experience in using intellectual assets to drive growth. But he won't be alone for long, as corporate IP strategy innovators, inspired by the 카지노 바카라 example, blaze similar trails one company at a time.
David Kline is a wr카지노 바카라er and consultant specializing in intellectual property strategy. He is the author of "Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents."

15,000개의 아티클을 제대로 즐기는 방법

가입하면, 한 달 무료!

걱정마세요. 언제든 해지 가능합니다.

인기기사

질문, 답변, 연관 아티클 확인까지 한번에! 경제·카지노 바카라 관련 질문은 AskBiz에게 물어보세요. 오늘은 무엇을 도와드릴까요?

Click!